On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:20:46AM +0100, Tony Prisk wrote: > On 23/04/13 14:13, Tony Prisk wrote: > > On 23/04/13 03:27, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >> This patch updates the in-kernel dts files according to the latest cpus > >> and cpu bindings updates for ARM. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8505.dtsi | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8505.dtsi > >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8505.dtsi > >> index e74a1c0..a470808 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8505.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8505.dtsi > >> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ > >> cpus { > >> cpu@0 { > >> - compatible = "arm,arm926ejs"; > >> + compatible = "arm,arm926"; > >> }; > >> }; > > As the only author for that file, and the arch-vt8500 maintainer, a CC > > would have been nice :) > > > > This binding is still incomplete.device_type, compatible and reg are > > all required properties. > > Also, you seem to have only fixed the wm8505.dtsi, while vt8500.dtsi, > > wm8650.dtsi and wm8850.dtsi are all left incorrect. > > > > I am already carrying a patch to fix all this properly so could you > > drop the arch-vt8500 related patch and I will send in a more complete > > version for 3.11 > > > > Regards > > Tony Prisk > > I didn't notice the rules had been changed in the last patch - shouldn't > you be changing the rules (read: binding) before changing the devicetree > files?
Fair enough, point taken. > Request still stands - please drop this patch and I will submit a more > complete one with the other SoCs updated as well. Great, thanks, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss