On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:15:51AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> writes:
> > I think this will save a *lot* of identical code in all the > > drivers, that will just have to call > > pinctrl_select_pm_sleep(), pinctrl_select_pm_default() > > pinctrl_select_pm_idle() instead of all the complex code. > > This is what I planned to do but never got around to. > What about taking it one tiny step further, and having it done by the PM > core itself? > Seems like something that should just be done as part of runtime PM > transitions and the suspend/resume process. Indeed, I remember suggesting this as part of the original discussion of having the code do the default state setting. It seems like there ought to be very few devices which actively manage pinctrl themselves, otherwise we'll get a lot of boilerplate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
