Hi,

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 02:13:57PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Use the generic PHY framework API to get the PHY. The usb_phy_set_resume
> and usb_phy_set_suspend is replaced with power_on/get_sync and
> power_off/put_sync to align with the new PHY framework.
> 
> musb->xceiv can't be removed as of now because musb core uses xceiv.state and
> xceiv.otg. Once there is a separate state machine to handle otg, these can be
> moved out of xceiv and then we can start using the generic PHY framework.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c |    1 +
>  drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h |    3 +++
>  drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c  |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> index 37a261a..f732bcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> @@ -1864,6 +1864,7 @@ musb_init_controller(struct device *dev, int nIrq, void 
> __iomem *ctrl)
>       musb->board_set_power = plat->set_power;
>       musb->min_power = plat->min_power;
>       musb->ops = plat->platform_ops;
> +     musb->phy_label = plat->phy_label;
>  
>       /* The musb_platform_init() call:
>        *   - adjusts musb->mregs
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> index 7fb4819..498ae21 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>  #include <linux/usb.h>
>  #include <linux/usb/otg.h>
>  #include <linux/usb/musb.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>  
>  struct musb;
>  struct musb_hw_ep;
> @@ -357,6 +358,7 @@ struct musb {
>       u16                     int_tx;
>  
>       struct usb_phy          *xceiv;
> +     struct phy              *phy;
>  
>       int nIrq;
>       unsigned                irq_wake:1;
> @@ -434,6 +436,7 @@ struct musb {
>       unsigned                double_buffer_not_ok:1;
>  
>       struct musb_hdrc_config *config;
> +     const char              *phy_label;
>  
>  #ifdef MUSB_CONFIG_PROC_FS
>       struct proc_dir_entry *proc_entry;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> index 628b93f..c62a004 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> @@ -348,14 +348,24 @@ static int omap2430_musb_init(struct musb *musb)
>        * up through ULPI.  TWL4030-family PMICs include one,
>        * which needs a driver, drivers aren't always needed.
>        */
> -     if (dev->parent->of_node)
> +     if (dev->parent->of_node) {
> +             musb->phy = devm_phy_get(dev->parent, "usb2-phy");
> +
> +             /* We can't totally remove musb->xceiv as of now because
> +              * musb core uses xceiv.state and xceiv.otg. Once we have
> +              * a separate state machine to handle otg, these can be moved
> +              * out of xceiv and then we can start using the generic PHY
> +              * framework
> +              */
>               musb->xceiv = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev->parent,
>                   "usb-phy", 0);
> -     else
> +     } else {
>               musb->xceiv = devm_usb_get_phy_dev(dev, 0);
> +             musb->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, musb->phy_label);
> +     }
>  
> -     if (IS_ERR(musb->xceiv)) {
> -             status = PTR_ERR(musb->xceiv);
> +     if (IS_ERR(musb->xceiv) || IS_ERR(musb->phy)) {
> +             status = PTR_ERR(musb->xceiv) | PTR_ERR(musb->phy);
>  
>               if (status == -ENXIO)
>                       return status;
> @@ -397,9 +407,10 @@ static int omap2430_musb_init(struct musb *musb)
>       if (glue->status != OMAP_MUSB_UNKNOWN)
>               omap_musb_set_mailbox(glue);
>  
> -     usb_phy_init(musb->xceiv);
> +     phy_init(musb->phy);
>  
>       pm_runtime_put_noidle(musb->controller);
> +     phy_pm_runtime_put(musb->phy);

see, weird unbalanced calls :-)

Make it all explicit:

phy_pm_runtime_get_sync(phy);
phy_init(phy);
phy_pm_runtime_put(phy);

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to