On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:02 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 17:55-20130702, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > Instead of defining an enumeration with the FW specific values for the
> > different clock rates, use the actual frequency instead.  Also add a
> > boolean to specify whether the clock is XTAL or not.
> > 
> > Change all board files to reflect this.
> > 
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
> > Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coe...@ti.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c      |    3 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c          |    5 ++-
> ^^
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c         |    3 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c       |    3 +-
> ^^
> Please do not add more platform data to platforms that are DT only.

Ah, I hadn't realized that board_omap4panda.c and board-4430sdp.c had
been removed in linux-next.  I base my tree on wireless-next and it
doesn't contain these changes yet.  I would only have noticed this when
I rebased my tree once the merge window is closed. ;)

Thanks for pointing out, I'll make sure these changes will not be there
when I send the pull request.

--
Cheers,
Luca.

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to