* Luciano Coelho <coe...@ti.com> [130702 13:33]: > On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:02 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 17:55-20130702, Luciano Coelho wrote: > > > Instead of defining an enumeration with the FW specific values for the > > > different clock rates, use the actual frequency instead. Also add a > > > boolean to specify whether the clock is XTAL or not. > > > > > > Change all board files to reflect this. > > > > > > Cc: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> > > > Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coe...@ti.com> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 3 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 5 ++- > > ^^ > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c | 3 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c | 3 +- > > ^^ > > Please do not add more platform data to platforms that are DT only. > > Ah, I hadn't realized that board_omap4panda.c and board-4430sdp.c had > been removed in linux-next. I base my tree on wireless-next and it > doesn't contain these changes yet. I would only have noticed this when > I rebased my tree once the merge window is closed. ;) > > Thanks for pointing out, I'll make sure these changes will not be there > when I send the pull request.
Please separate out the minimal pdata and arch/arm/mach-omap2 changes int a immutable branch on v3.11-rc1 that I can also pull in. For v3.12, we're going to be making more boards device tree only, so these changes may otherwise cause pointless merge conflicts. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
