On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:46:43AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:31:08PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That's not ARM only and I thought we were getting generic versions of it > > anyway? ARMv8, MIPS, Microblaze, Hexagon and SH also define it. > Okay, that's fair. I'm only vaguely familiar with the generic _relaxed > variants, but until they land, how do we appropriately declare the > dependency to prevent breaking COMPILE_TEST builds on architectures that > don't have them? Or should we either bother? > Do we need to introduce a HAVE_RELAXED_IO_ACCESSORS selected by those > architectures with support? I think that or just getting generic versions done would be the way forwards. Right now it's a bit of a shambles.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
