On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:58:05PM -0500, Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> It sounds to me as though he had 4.1.1-3 and 4.1.1-4, but has since
> removed 4.1.1-3, so has only 4.1.1-4. This looks as though it is the
> intended state.
> [...]
I've seen RPM get confused and have multiple instances of the same
package (sometimes even with the same version) installed when one of
the %post, %preun, %postun scripts fails.
Anyway, forcing the install of the correct one will make things work, but
RPM will give interesting results to rpm -q.
Gordon
--
Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.e-smith.org (development) http://www.e-smith.com (corporate)
Phone: +1 (613) 564 8000 ext. 4378 Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739
e-smith, inc. 1500-150 Metcalfe St, Ottawa, ON K2P 1P1 Canada