> [...]
> Agreed. For the case of .*.swp, that indicates someone is editing a
> template file with vi (or they were and the editor crashed). Should we even
> build the template in this case?
Hmm, in the fullness of time, I'd like to warn if templates under
/etc/e-smith/templates have been modified - they shouldn't
be. Checking this is somewhat expensive to do during template
expansion :-)
While examining each fragment in /etc/e-smith/templates:
Is this file owned by an RPM?
Yes - warn if modified
No - ignore and warn
> Also add
>
> *.bak
>
> to the list.
And while we're at it, RCS/, CVS/ and SCCS/ in case anyone puts their
templates-custom under version control.
Gordon
--
Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.e-smith.org (development) http://www.e-smith.com (corporate)
Phone: +1 (613) 564 8000 ext. 4378 Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739
e-smith, inc. 1500-150 Metcalfe St, Ottawa, ON K2P 1P1 Canada
