On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 02:23:31PM -0000, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > In that case IMO it may be best that we (devinfo) leave the current samba > fragments plain and let you (Mitel) implement the perl guards
That's fine. > and work > this into the server-manager Workgroup panel as best fits your objectives. Initially they would just depend on SambaDomainMaster. Further options may come later. > Would you agree? Yes. > Maybe a better question is how close are you to releasing a samba 2.2.2 > blade for testing? Close - we're working out the dance steps now - we need it to work without the "--nodeps" option, and need to support 2.0.x and 2.2.x Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
