On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:41:24PM -0800, Tom Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we still using the e-smith-{package-name}-{version}.{release}.{arch}.rpm
> format for naming RPM's, or should it be changed to something like
> mitel-sme-{package-name}-{version}.{release}.{arch}.rpmYou are free to use anything you like. There is no problem with calling your RPM 'tomcarroll-1.3.0-01.noarch.rpm' if you so desire. We would prefer that you didn't name your packages 'mitel-' as that should really be considered our (Mitel's) namespace. For example, Darrell uses 'dmc-mitel', which makes it clear that it is created by DMC for a Mitel product. You might like to consider a similar naming scheme (carroll-mitel-...) Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
