On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, David Brown wrote:
> > Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > This is especially true for servers running in serveronly mode. > > > > Absolutely, ... how did I miss that great example! Definitely not needed > > there and that takes care of most of the larger SME corporate > > clients where > > corporate firewalls/VPN are already in place doing their thing. > > I understand this, since you only implement masq in gateway mode, but I left > that fact out of my previous post because I don't see it as being very > feasible to have serveronly mode based on a 2.4.x kernel and server and > gateway mode dependent on modules that force a 2.2.x kernel. How do you > ship a product like that? You (probably) don't. But that's a marketing problem not a development one. :-) -- Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lead Product Developer Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com/ Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/ Phone: +1 (613) 368 4376 or 564 8000 Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739 -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
