From: "Tavin Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > No, this one's trivial to solve. We've talked about doing selective caching > in 0.4 or soon after. Nodes should incorporate a simple key closeness > judgment as well as a load balancing judgment in the selective cache test. > Then if you request all parts of a splitfile, your node will only cache > some of them. Selective caching has its drawbacks too... the data store will lose the convenient local caching function it has now. When I open the same file a second time, there is a chance I will have to wait for it to load through Freenet again - rather than pop up from the local data store instantly. Is this a convenience versus deniability question? It could actually become a runtime option. -Stefan _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet toad
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet toad
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet David Childers
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet Michael Rogers
