On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 04:45:46PM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > Yeah, but people don't like being forced to solve puzzles to send > > email. > And they really don't like to be spammed. Really, even from an > information theory perspective, either giving the sender a piece of > information that allows them to send you one email, or having an operation > that only a human can do is the only way to prevent mechanical > spamming. So get over it. Additionally, we are fortunate enough to have (possibly the first) implementation of think cash in the form of GJs work - I am looking forward to the next version. Ian.
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Peter Todd
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
PGP signature