On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 06:10:46AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:

> I don't have a great reason, except it made my coding slightly
> easier :).  I would expect the same default groups would continue to
> be used, but this _would_ allow us to change the default groups later
> without invalidating all the data on the network.

at the cost of storing the group with every SVK based key.

> > Thats a real y,p,g,q set - and that's a big header.
> 
> That still slides under 1024 by a couple hundred.

Well, as long as noone wants bigger groups that's ok.

AGL

-- 
I never let my schooling get in the way of my education.

PGP signature

Reply via email to