On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 06:10:46AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > I don't have a great reason, except it made my coding slightly > easier :). I would expect the same default groups would continue to > be used, but this _would_ allow us to change the default groups later > without invalidating all the data on the network. at the cost of storing the group with every SVK based key. > > Thats a real y,p,g,q set - and that's a big header. > > That still slides under 1024 by a couple hundred. Well, as long as noone wants bigger groups that's ok. AGL -- I never let my schooling get in the way of my education.
- [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storables, and ... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, St... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 Standard for Keys, Storab... Scott Gregory Miller
PGP signature