On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 04:05:44PM +0100, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 04:41:38PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Not good enough. We need to be able to fit both 2048 and 4096 bit keys.
> >
> > And as I remember it, everybody had a hissy fit when I wanted to use a
> > similiar manner to denote subsets way back when, which is why we ended up
> > with the (imo clumsy) dot field notation...
>
> So Public-key.y, Public-key.p, .g and .q ok?
>
>
>Storable.Public-key.y=15102b30436e41a6c9b52d6146d2f3862a84e7b51e28db943d125dbd180ac0088e91167fb04bcbd73ac9cac18d77587718000838ee1a3ffdd7fe1dccb9d2d3159297fae239ab82e3635c2889cfa82ee7c1e0d5ec6bd829395db3d04b6fa80f360b3bd8cfec7e9494332b029ba2aae0fe590c144eb14adb8e16ba0a25c20ad8d0
>
>Storable.Public-key.p=a21a980fc9ae82b90344e8e2490da9c9765f80bc07f3bf832af1bc68c25608cb3676313de1178082929481f08996fab332d11abc832d646b4190dcd4053a560798767a2b01f413511d637166098f602bf785dbed49486771a6d542a78f54fa34f7055f0c3f11829fbec3624b9273f8f987670dd6453a6fb313c7466848b2a23f
>
>Storable.Public-key.g=3c88434bf33b1a74ef91c2394783a5eab326dbe5c633b58f766dd18210e0eaa4c104e9df1404c3f685239d95df014bf7835fe3b50ceeeab1ef2df69368bfe79deaa0153eeae2f4e5a18410623a27d61bc4808ae80bfd2961b0ed1d9054eecd69bf55938e3b05852f6031ed2fe5ebe747520fc0fff69af2536f42ee27b9fa4d7b
> Storable.Public-key.q=d99d5fff8862230d8aa205e973a3bdf45638ddd1
Which is bloody awful and shows the problem with using dot notation (in
fact, the constants are just lists of bytes, maybe each one should be on a
seperate entry)...
--
'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
'Here,' Montag touched his head.
'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
Oskar Sandberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
