On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:16:22PM +0100, toad wrote: > It is a real problem because Brandon and others want to use highly descriptive > human written metadata, for example the Dublin Core stuff includes several fuzzy > fields. Well then Dublin Core or whatever should be treated as a different kind of metadata, with a field pointing to the CHK of the data itself, or even encourage people to distribute two CHKs pointing to the Dublin Core stuff and the metadata. What it should *NOT* do is be treated as a *replacement* for the current metadata mechanism which is working fine thanks very much. Ian.
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? david
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? david
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? toad
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Oskar Sandberg
- RE: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? david
- RE: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Scott Gregory Miller
- RE: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Benjamin Coates
PGP signature