RE: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs?

[Benjamin Coates]

>From toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>It is a real problem because Brandon and others want to use highly
>descriptive human written metadata, for example the Dublin Core stuff
>includes several fuzzy fields.

What's the point of attaching this highly descriptive stuff to the file at 
all?
Wouldn't this belong in an seperate indexing/searching layer?  The sort of 
metadata you need in a CHK is stuff like content-type or part-number or 
whatever, that lets you interpret the data you have, not author or keywords or 
subject (that lets you find or categorize the data)

--
Benjamin Coates


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl