On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 03:10:01PM -0700, coderman wrote: > Who would be responsible for the unrequest? The requestor (the clients should be designed to make this easy, or automatic in some circumstances). Crypto would ensure that you can only unrequest your own requests. > Could this be used to censor certain key data? Lets say the MPAA decides > to search freenet for 'DeCSS' and then issue unrequests > for all the results which it finds. Could they do this? Sure, but it wouldn't have any detrimental effect on the number of copies of DeCSS out there since they will only be unrequesting their own requests. Ian.
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... coderman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... coderman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Mark J. Roberts