Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 05:34:40PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> >>It is pretty crazy that we are considering removing backward
> >>compatability between 0.5pre2 and 0.5pre3.
> >
> >513 IS pre2. pre1 didn't work anyway.
>
>
> But it isn't just pre1 we are losing backward compatability with, it is
> every single build before 513, many of which did work reasonably well.
Would it be possible to build in an "exception list" into the node of versions
that you won't talk to?
Eg a Minimum version and a list of "bad" version numbers?
> Ian.
Adrian
---------------------------------------------------------------
Adrian Tritschler mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
