On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:54:48PM +0100, Anonymous wrote: > Ian Clarke wrote: > > Cool, let us know when you are done. > > Ian. > > no, u do not understand me very well... > I'll not do anything!
Thanks for spoofing my email address, troll. > > I'm saying that the choice of Java was a mistake since the begin. Maybe it was. We're stuck with it unless we want to take a year or two out from developing freenet to port freenet. > > anyway I think it's not so painful a port from java to c > and it could be done with an automatic translator like JCC The code generated would be legible/maintainable? Realistically we are looking at a semi-automated port to C++, but _even then_ we would need a whole lot of new or rewritten code, and we would not get the magical performance benefits that are typically attributed to rewriting in a more sane language. And we'd need somebody actively maintaining it on each supported platform (Windows being the main problem here). > > then the developing process could proceed in C language > > regards. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://80-192-4-23.cable.ubr09.na.blueyonder.co.uk:8889/SPmjEh6sH3Y/ ICTHUS.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
