On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 11:40:51AM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > AutoRequester), run in a separate VM if we run the client code separate > > from the node, and with its own port. It might be a superset of low > > I am not sure I will ever understand those that argue that we should > run different things in different VMs. Requiring more than one > concurrent JVM will only serve to further burden our user's computers. > > The idea that this is the only way we can achieve modularity is akin to > the argument that the only way we could stop ourselves picking our > noses is by chopping off our fingers.
I am saying that if the user does run the two systems in separate VMs, then the FEC code should run in the client VM rather than the node VM. Nevermind. The more important point I was trying to make was that high level FCP is really client/ stuff, uses a lot of client/, and has little to do with node/, so it _may_ make sense to run it on a separate port, and keep low-level FCP simple. > > Ian. > > -- > Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]|locut.us|cematics.com] > Latest Project http://locut.us/ > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/ -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://0.0.0.0:8889/HPhwJMG1iEE/ ICTHUS.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
