Well, I am not sure why this would be useful, but if we were to do it, 
the best bet might be BeanShell (www.beanshell.org) - this is actually 
pretty cool generally, those that don't know of it might be interested 
to take a look.

Another possibility would be SISC (sisc.sf.net).  This is a Java scheme 
interpreter.  It has the advantage that it was created by our very own 
Scott Miller.

Still, I really don't understand what this would be useful for.

Ian.

On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 08:38:37PM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Sometime in the Freenet 0.5 series, it would be really useful to include
> some form of scripting. I believe if we include the interpreter in
> fproxy, or generally somewhere in the web interface code, and the code
> can only call methods that we provide, we can make it reasonably safe.
> So, we need some sort of virtual machine or interpreter that matches the
> above conditions. Is there a suitable javascript interpreter (which is
> license compatible with Freenet, so not Rhino)? Is there any possibility
> of loading java bytecode into a running JVM and isolating it from all
> methods except for one class that we provide? Anyone got code,
> experience, ideas?
> -- 
> Matthew Toseland
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Full time freenet hacker.
> http://freenetproject.org/
> Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://0.0.0.0:8889/HPhwJMG1iEE/
> ICTHUS.



-- 
Ian Clarke                [EMAIL PROTECTED]|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project                                          http://locut.us/
Personal Homepage                                   http://locut.us/ian/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to