Matthias, please understand unstable is and has always been the testbed to help get the main network in order, by using it you benefit yourself and the network as a whole as a unstable user you need to know how to handle the technicalities of freenet sometimes unstable will be *unstable* it is the testbed to improve the network please don't freak and give up your node, don't give up now it's just about to get interesting
pete -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Toad Sent: 23 October 2003 01:41 To: Discussion of development issues Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Don't upgrade to 6269 On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:33:44AM +0200, Matthias wrote: > Toad schrieb: > > > >It IS called unstable you know. > > Now it is called deleted for me. Stable didn't work a bit in the last > weeks for me, unstable was quite useable but which such actions it's We have reports of it working. > also of no use to me. I said a dev network with only NGR nodes would > be a good idea, but I never thought you would force every unstable > node to switch to it (and this is what you are currently doing). So > freenet won't work with stable, and with unstable I can only access a > small dev network with minimal or no content. So why should I run it > anymore. The Temporarily small. The whole idea is to get a largish test network running only NGRouting so we can test NGRouting. > only really sad thing about this is that I just spent quite at bit of > money to upgrade the RAM on the box running fred. > > So time to look for something else to run on this box. > > Greets Matthias -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
