On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote: > Matthias wrote: > >Toad schrieb: > >Stable didn't work a bit in the last > >weeks for me, unstable was quite useable but which such actions it's > >also of no use to me. > > The purpose of running unstable is not to be "of use" to you, but to be > of use to the developers with improving and debugging Freenet. If you > don't want to participate in the fork, simply don't upgrade to the > post-fork unstable builds.
Um, I don't care about participating in the fork one way or the other. I care that my damm node is connected to nobody right now since this incredibly "well thought out" switch requires EVERYONE to figure out where the hell the unstable noderefs are. Oh: And most of my connections are 5028. And they're all inbound. This is what people are pissed about: Yes, we ALL upgraded, but we can't FIND each other since the code wisely threw out the noderefs. So rather then doing a check of those refs to see if they've also upgraded, it just forgets them. Congrats, we just made a network of one machine. And not just ONE network! We've got around 200 of them! Lots of testing going on. --Dan
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
