* Thomas Bruderer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-19 14:59:02]: > > > And what's the reason of the backoff ? :) isn't it a high network latency ? > > > > > try pinging a backed off peer. > > Good idea I did that... now look at the result: > Low Level PING, i.e. ICMP > > None means they dont respond to ICMP Packets... I love those. > > CONNECTED 120.371 Fred,0.7,1.0,633 > CONNECTED 196.982 Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > CONNECTED 115.929 Fred,0.7,1.0,647 > CONNECTED NONE Fred,0.7,1.0,625 > CONNECTED 101.057 Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > CONNECTED NONE Fred,0.7,1.0,647 > CONNECTED 153.666 Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > CONNECTED NONE Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > CONNECTED NONE Fred,0.7,1.0,625 > BACKED OFF NONE Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > BACKED OFF 51.486 Fred,0.7,1.0,647 > BACKED OFF 561.061 Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > BACKED OFF 131.108 Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > BACKED OFF 1143.935 Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > BACKED OFF NONE Fred,0.7,1.0,647 > BACKED OFF 65.244 Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > BACKED OFF 126.501 Fred,0.7,1.0,648 > BACKED OFF NONE Fred,0.7,1.0,622 > BACKED OFF 57.296 Fred,0.7,1.0,647 > > I tried it 3 times (real time) and the results where similar all the time also > the low pinger were backed off for quite long time intervals.
Assuming your measures are accurate : 10 BACKED OFF peers, 2 where data is unaviable => 8 remaining 2 of them have a "low level" ping >500ms <= the backoff is justified for sure => 6 remaining Then, please increase the loglevel (set it to MINOR) and see how big is the high level ping. Give us some details on your physical connection (the bandwidth the ISP advertizes), and your bandwidth limit in freenet.ini plus the total number of peers. NextGen$ _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
