* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-28 17:08:15]: > On Monday 28 April 2008 16:18, Florent Daignière wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-28 14:28:50]: > > > > > Author: toad > > > Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 +0000 (Mon, 28 Apr 2008) > > > New Revision: 19582 > > > > > > Modified: > > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java > > > Log: > > > Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps. > > > > > > > Huh ? > > > > What has changed since we agreed on using 128kbps ? > > > > That will significantly impair the performances and general browsing > > experience of users using a slower link! > > And significantly increase performance for users using at least a 256kbps > link. Optimise the common case! However, we should probably reduce the actual > limits to half the specified upload speed, i.e. from 24 to 16 for 256kbps. >
How so? Last time I checked my node didn't use even a quarter of the alloted bandwidth > Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps upstream? > Anyone got one? I had one for years; my parents still have one iirc
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
