* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 14:44:27]: > On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daignière wrote: > > * Florent Daignière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: > > > > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: > > > > > > > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he > > > > might > want > > > > to review this before I apply it. > > > > > > > > > > There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits that > > > need updating :/ > > > > > > See #74 > > > > http://download.intel.com/design/processor/applnots/24161832.pdf > > > http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/25481.pdf > > > > Here are the CPUID codes if you want to update them. > > > So should we or shouldn't we apply yongjhen's patch?
I think that applying that patch instead of updating the whole set of codes is not the way to go... If we were really after performances we would recompile the native libraries with the new libgmp... which has performances boost on that kind of (recent) processors.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
