On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:19, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Matthew Toseland > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 20:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Uh? You have to mark in-memory objects as unused to get rid of them? > > > > No, on-disk ones. Because db4o is query-oriented, it doesn't know what objects > > you want and what you don't. > > I think this is probably an apples and oranges comparison. In Perst > you store things in collections, unless I'm missing something those > things still have to be deleted from those collections or Perst will > retain them.
Or you refer to them from another object. Or you refer to them from the root object. But clearly it's a result of different design philosophies. > > Ian.
pgpI7tOL0Jnaa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
