On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Matthew Toseland
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 00:59:55 Daniel Cheng wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 02 June 2009 18:24:48 steve wrote:
>> >> What good is constantly displaying the security level, unless the user 
>> >> would
>> >> like to change it frequently for some reason?
>> >>
>> >> The node already asks them which level they want at install time and it is
>> >> easily accessible from the config page, so what do they gain by being
>> >> constantly reminded which security level they are on?
>> >
>> > They might forget! :)
>> >
>> > Seriously, right now we constantly display the security levels on the 
>> > homepage, and there's a reason for that: they are important, we want 
>> > people to add friends and upgrade from NORMAL to HIGH. We used to have an 
>> > explicit warning about running opennet for this reason, now we just show 
>> > the security levels.
>>
>> If this is the case, the alert / status line should read: "if you add
>> some friends, your node would be faster, more secure, better, ......"
>>
>> The current alert of "Security Level: LOW" have no this effect.
>
> Well it used to say that ... really I am not convinced that it is faster, 
> although I can see it would be more stable ... all that we need users to know 
> is that they do not have as good security as they could have, doesn't the 
> security levels alert fulfill this purpose given that we explain the security 
> levels during installation?
>

The current alert just say "hey, you are insecure!", but it does not
tell the user what should he do.
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to