Am Montag, 24. Dezember 2012, 21:11:55 schrieb Robert Hailey: > With that being said, the scarce resource (in theory) would be location > (detectable by network address), because an attacker simulating many nodes > would likely have them in a very confined space (like a server closet or a > few buildings here-and-there), and could not spoof a wildly different > location because it would interfere with routing.
Except if he just bought some time on one of the million-computer botnets for doing the attack. But aside that: If we can marry your idea with transport plugins, that might be an option to create scarcity at least for some transports. Freenet could then prefer scarce transports over abundant transports - if available. Best wishes, Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
