On Monday 22 Jul 2013 20:23:48 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 22 Jul 2013 19:07:46 Michael Grube wrote: > > For what it's worth, I think there is some potential here. > > > > If Freenet were tweaked to favor performance slightly over cryptography and > > anonymous routing(I'm not suggesting we get rid of these things > > completely), it might be worth attempting to sell as a very cheap cloud > > service. There is a company, Space Monkey, that is employing this exact > > model - the difference between them and any other file sharing platform > > being that they distribute devices to their users, who end up paying very > > low prices for storage. It's interesting enough to me that, with a little > > bit of funding, I would like to help design and build a similar solution > > based on Freenet. In fact, Freenet might have an advantage over competing > > services because it's open source. Just a thought. There are people that I > > know I could pitch to and I can't be the only person on this list who can > > say that. Maybe then we wouldn't have the same time and money problems. :) > > OMGCP. Seriously, you need to be able to trace and delete content, don't you? > IMHO selling hardware is something that somebody needs to get into eventually - the point is you need to be careful how you structure it. Plus, right now Freenet's performance is dire.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
