I think you should discuss this a little bit out. From outside it looks like apparently bountysource was dismissed because of a condition, which does not exist anymore, but not seeing this someone asked to turn your back from bountysource. So: Is it true that bountysource can be used in a way which fits to your needs? If this is the case, does this recent approach is like this? And if yes, do you really want to re-do this approach then? Seems tragic when bountysource turns out to be fine, but nevertheless the approach is re-done...
Greetings... --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> Datum: 12.09.2015 16:06:21 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [freenet-dev] freenet @ bountysource > Am Samstag, 12. September 2015, 10:37:38 schrieb Florent Daigniere: > > Heh. Last time we've talked about it the consensus was that bounty > > wasn't what we wanted... as it creates skewed incentives that alienates > > > core work. Has that changed? shouldn't we talk about it first? > > It added fixed monthly payments ? not tied to a bounty. So if we can > disable bounties and restrict it to monthly payments we get rid of the > bad incentives. > > I think I posted about that change when they invited us to the > invitation only phase ? maybe ?no comment? isn?t quite equivalent to > ?OK? but rather to ?no action?? sorry if that went wrong. > > Taking it down when it?s claimed should be easy (I hope). > > Best wishes, > Arne > -- > singing a part of the history of free software: > > - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [email protected] > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
