On 11/21/2015 11:22 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Q: Has anyone got into trouble for their anonymous activities while > running Freenet? A: US law enforcement can identify anonymous users of > Freenet[1] and Tor[2]. It is reasonable to assume that other governments > have access to the same technology, which is provided by private > contractors. If you are concerned about governments, you should use > darknet mode, and bear in mind that no current anonymity technology > provides perfect protection. > > And possibly: > While we applaud the US police's apparent success in apprehending > suspects allegedly sharing child abuse images, many governments > persecute and prosecute political dissidents for legitimate speech > published online. Therefore we hope to further improve Freenet's > security in future, to protect its legitimate users. We do not have the > ability to easily identify users of Freenet downloading specific files. > > [1] = > http://www.thedickinsonpress.com/news/north-dakota/3885239-predators-police-online-struggle > [2] = > http://motherboard.vice.com/read/court-docs-show-a-university-helped-fbi-bust-silk-road-2-child-porn-suspects > > Also reference this in the attacks section. > I will update the wiki. > > Sorry I haven't posted a pull request; I'm nowhere near synchronized > with the website updates...
Opened as https://github.com/freenet/website/pull/30#issuecomment-159449783
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
