Also, the clusters all appear close to your respective node's locations, as expected, and certainly not around 0.00 (which would be on the top or on the extreme right of the circle plot, I'm not reading the code at the moment).
Again, I see no reason to worry. Op 4 dec. 2015 17:16 schreef "Bert Massop" <bert.mas...@gmail.com>: > The histogram shows peer locations w.r.t. your own peer, otherwise known > as *distances*. You expect >70% of your peers to be in the [0.0,0.05) > column. Looks perfectly normal to me, or am I missing something? > > — Bert > Op 4 dec. 2015 17:10 schreef "Steve Dougherty" <st...@asksteved.com>: > >> The network may be experiencing a pitch black attack, or maybe a Sybil >> variant on it? (Given the assumption that few people are using darknet; >> we should add a probe for security levels.) From talking on IRC, I am >> not alone in observing peer locations severely clustered around 0.00: >> >> Me: https://i.imgur.com/PDxrKVT.png >> Psalle: https://i.imgur.com/DWJVgRR.png >> mrsteveman1: https://i.imgur.com/6ORJz9m.jpg >> https://i.imgur.com/JLqoc0J.jpg >> >> Might this explain my relatively recent inability to see some posts / >> messages on FMS / FLIP / Sone? I'll see replies but not the original >> messages. >> >> - Steve >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devl mailing list >> Devl@freenetproject.org >> https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >> > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
