The circle plot shows the peer location, the histogram does not. We should
instead fix the histogram to show the peer locations.

Should be 15 minutes of work at most, if I don't see a pull request by
tomorrow I'll file one.

All the best,
Bert
Op 4 dec. 2015 17:29 schreef "Michael Grube" <michael.gr...@gmail.com>:

> If this graph is a measure of your distance from your peers we should
> reconsider the graph title.
> On Dec 4, 2015 11:25 AM, "Steve Dougherty" <st...@asksteved.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12/04/2015 11:20 AM, Bert Massop wrote:
> > > Also, the clusters all appear close to your respective node's
> locations,
> > as
> > > expected, and certainly not around 0.00 (which would be on the top or
> on
> > > the extreme right of the circle plot, I'm not reading the code at the
> > > moment).
> > >
> > > Again, I see no reason to worry.
> >
> > Oh, okay. That makes sense. I will say that naming a distance plot "Peer
> > Location Distribution" is extraordinarily misleading.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devl mailing list
> > Devl@freenetproject.org
> > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl@freenetproject.org
> https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to