Florent Daigniere writes: > "don't be strategic" > I've counted how many of your "points" got allocated to items that do > *not* have "WoT" or "Freetalk" in their description... and the grand- > total is ... 85 points out of 1000. I'm sure that none of this is > strategic coming from someone who's paid by the project to work on > both.
Given that xor spent the past half year working on WoT as a volunteer, worked on Freetalk and WoT as a volunteer before being paid for some time, did his bachlor thesis on WoT and is willing to work full time for a year for meager 27k$ (for reference: I wouldn’t even start considering it at less than three times that amount), I think that xor honestly thinks that WoT and Freetalk are the most important next steps for Freenet which easily trump most other parts by several orders of magnitude. So I do not think it is called for to call this a strategic vote. However I do think we need a clear message of confidence from Ian that this method will not be used as binding vote. @Ian: can you make a clear statement that this will not be used as justification that we “must” take a given decision? This is the only way I see to avoid providing fuel to toxic discussions about the votes (which already started here). Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
