On 28/08/16 19:29, Ian wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Matthew Toseland <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Asking us not to take into account the technical >> difficulty of each task when prioritizing arguably > That's not what was asked. My prioritization proposal separates the > estimation of the value of completing a task from the estimation of the > task's cost. These can then be combined later to come up with a > prioritization.
Which will inherently prefer "easy wins". Which is probably a good thing. Some of the proposals are "WTF, why didn't you just send a patch" though. :) > Ian.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
