On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 1:32 PM, Matthew Toseland [email protected] wrote: On 28/08/16 19:29, Ian wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Matthew Toseland <[email protected]> wrote:> That's not what was asked. My prioritization proposal separates the
estimation of the value of completing a task from the estimation of the
task's cost. These can then be combined later to come up with a
prioritization.
Which will inherently prefer "easy wins". Which is probably a good thing. I agree. The principle is very simple, maximize value relative to cost. Then all you need is a way to estimate value and cost, these are hard problems in the general case but I think our approaches will work well. So, if anyone disagrees with the approach, either they disagree that we must maximize value relative to cost (I'd love to hear that argument), or they need to propose a better approach to estimating value and cost. Ian. Ian Clarke Founder, The Freenet Project Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
