On Saturday, January 28, 2017 04:57:58 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > PS: Finishing the first iteration of the WoT would normally be among > these two (with estimated 2.8 to 4.1 weeks ~ 2800$ to 4100$), but xor > pulled back his votes on that, so I won’t name it here until the > issue is resolved. That need not block the two tasks named here.
Also, for future discussions, please explicitly mention it when you're using the results from your custom evaluation algorithm, not our main one Ian tasked me with: With the "official" voting method, if I had voted 200 points for WoT as I originally planned but then did not actually do, WoT would be at rank 10, not 2 as you said. Luckily, this doesn't affect the first two winners you mentioned, they're at the same rank in the main "official" evaluation - but please be more careful with such things in the future, the evaluation method of any poll should not be implicitly changed without an explicit discussion beforehand and consensus upon it. Disclaimer: This isn't a "my method is better than your method" primitive human feud. I don't care about the poll methods currently as it doesn't affect me as a volunteer, I didn't even read up how yours works. It's just that the procedure of a "democratic" vote should be clearly predefined and not implicitly changed when stating results.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
