On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 13:02 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Florent Daigniere <[email protected]> writes: > > > > We could also move more of our discussions to FMS. It’s code has > > > nowadays been checked by at least two established users, and most > > > interactive development already happens over IRC. > > Or we could just migrate to slack (like Ian suggested ages ago). > > It's > > not like there has been any meaningful, productive, development- > > related > > discussion on this mailing list in the last few years. > > How is moving our actively used, freenode-provided IRC to centralized,
Freenode is centralized too; Slack has IRC and XMPP gateways https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/201727913-Connect-to-Slack-over-IRC-and-XMPP if the goal is to increase accessibility, Slack is better than IRC. > proprietary Slack comparable to moving our little used, self- > maintained mailing list We can't afford to run it anymore, that's the point... Slack can be archived (and indexed by search engines) just like our mailing lists http://slackarchive.io/ > to decentralized, pseudonymous, free licensed, > freenet-hosted FMS, which is where our active users already are? > You are in lalaland if you think that we can do what currently do with our mailing lists over Freenet. Almost two decades in the making, we've failed at building an ecosystem of tools people can use. Are you seriously suggesting that "having a working fred, working FMS" is an acceptable requirement for accessing what will be our future support mailing list? Florent
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
