I don't want to break links, but I also don't want that to become a blocker for updating to the new website. Hopefully there can be some way we can re-map URLs and then those that care about breaking links can migrate the important stuff over quickly. Ian.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 3:07 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de wrote: Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 08:54 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Florent just warned again, that the clock on osprey (all our >> non-standard hosting) is ticking. If we don’t act, this means that all >> links to the wiki stop working. > > This has never been expressed as a requirement until now. I personally > don't have a problem with the links being broken. > > https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2016-August/039236.html > 7 months into the plan, it's insane to start changing the requirements. I always said that we need to preserve links. Not only for the wiki. And not only starting 2016. That I get ignored is not my fault here. Breaking existing links and by that breaking the guides from the times when Freenet was a focus of anti-surveillance culture is dumb. This is not personal for me, but it is a topic I care about. It is dumb when companies break links, and it is dumber if we do it. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl Ian ClarkeStacks - Our AI will save your moneyhttp://trystacks.com/ _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
