> The complexity of having to build an XML parse into the clients is surely > very small -- there are many other supposedly open or free XML parsers, > one of which would surely do the job.
I am, of course, anti-XML. However, to be honest, I should point out NanoXML, a 5K jar for parsing XML, available on freshmeat. It looks pretty okay, but I haven't looked into it too much. I still think XML is a silly format to use, though. It would be good to use if we were going to be importing/exporting/editting metadata with other programs. I don't see that as being done very much. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
