-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
> Why do you think metadata for Freenet is likely to be small? Since Freenet
> can carry any kind of data, I'd figure it would also have to handle any kind
> of metadata.
I'm not saying that the metadata of *data* is small, but that the amount
of metadata Freenet will need to operate is small (content type, last
modified, etc..). I'm proposing splitting the metadata Freenet needs from
the metadata some client might want. That way we can use a compact format
for Freenet metadata, and a full-blown XML-or-whatever format (that the
servers will never look at) that can be associated with a key.
Scott
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE49SQVpXyM95IyRhURAiXYAKCcczP6NCbIGARVQgYlThtsjOEM9QCgu4zi
y+NV0031uoQChfsYIaJtMTY=
=cB3Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
