On Thursday, Apr 27, 2000, "Scott G. Miller" writes: > >> As I see it, the following are ripe for implementation now and all that >> is needed is for someone to take responsibility for them: >> >> Inter-node encryption > >I can take this one in the manner Oskar suggested. I've already completed >a key exchange and socket crypto layer. Its just a matter of hooking it >up to freenet at the connection layer. What cipher do we want to >use. My vote is for Blowfish or Twofish (probably the former since its >more aged :)
Ideally you want a way for nodes to be able to negotiate this somehow, to allow for future expansion and backwards compatibility. future backwards comatibility. uh-huh. I must be tired or something. > > > Local data encrpytion using the plaintext keys >Ditto. This is a client issue, probably a 20 minute job if we decide on a >cipher. Don't decide, let it be specified. -pj _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
