On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 07:18:51PM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > ...of data between each other. Of course any large node could be > replaced > > with several smaller nodes, but there may be times when running a large > > node is a sensible thing to do, such as when you just happen to have a > > big, fast computer with lots of HD space and bandwidth. You might as well > > put a big, fat node on it. In general, though, I neither see much of a > > need for highly scalable datastores, or any particular reason *not* to > > make the datastore highly scalable. It's more of an issue with a C port > > since that's what people trying to run high traffic nodes will probably > > run anyway. > > > > My main point is that I'm really getting quite tired of Travis insisting > that the Java node is some sort of toy thats badly flawed, highly > underpowered, and just around as a 'reference implementation.
Will this just turn into a C vs Java flamewar? All of the stuff that I said in that list of scalability issues that should be handled are stuff that can be handled by a C or a Java Freenet node implementation. Anyways, I just like C better than Java. So what?! -- Travis Bemann Sendmail is still screwed up on my box. My email address is really bemann at execpc.com. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 1434 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000803/220ce5fc/attachment.pgp>
