> While we wait for AGL to document Oskar and Scott's recent rearrangement of > the > key-handling (!), which is not particularly easy to reverse-engineer through > looking at the code - I think we need to think a bit harder about 0.3 We aren't rearranging the key-handling so much as inserting all the support structure for fully verified data.
> KHKs have now been removed, this is desirable, but the idea was that they > would > be replaced by fuzzy searching which won't make it in to the code until at > least > release 0.4.... this leaves a gap when there won't be any "guessable" keys > (unless I have misunderstood something from examining the new Freenet.keys > package). KSKs are equal to KHKs. They just arent forgable. We most certainly have guessable keys. Scott -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000806/f8af22b9/attachment.pgp>
