On Mon, 07 Aug 2000, Michael ROGERS wrote: > >KSKs are equal to KHKs. They just arent forgable. We most certainly have > >guessable keys. > > If KSK are guessable, they are forgable. See my post to freenet-tech for > details.
KSK's are not secure, but we think/hope they are obscured enough to help against cancers and alike (which are an issue because they effect people who choose not use guessable keys as well). People who want security will have to make sure they have a key or hash to validate the reply somehow. That goes for any application. > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev -- \oskar _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
