On Sun, 6 Aug 2000 06:36:08 -0700, freenet-dev-admin at lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> >But this happens naturally since the file is moved to the top of the stack >every time it is requested. I don't think there is any reason to artificially >inflate it. > >On Sun, 06 Aug 2000, Muzzle wrote: >> Sorry if this has been already proposed but i was thinking that a node >> should probably keep longer the files it is more likely to be requested >> for (ie the closest to its key) & delete first files that are "farther" >> from its key and will probably get much less requests. This should >> probably be of some weight when purging the datastore togeter with the >> number of requests, the size and the age of the doc. >> >> Well you can tell me that this optimization is already done by the >> weight given to the number of requests but IMHO it gets useful with not >> often requested files that would be stored on a couple of nodes for a >> little longer time before completely disappearing from the net. >> >> Michele The systm wold keep files longer in a few nodes even when they are not requested for a while. I like it, I think we might want to let data stay around some more when someone could still need it. It's an inflation that would work on a couple of node only, will just improve file retainement. Michele -- Muzzle, Flatline, Zero on IRC; ICQ# 36124438 Key fingerprint: 5881 356B DDA7 115B 6FAF C529 34ED 70A8 7E52 D805 www.internations.net/it/muzzle "We are, we can, we will" _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
