On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 06:20:45PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > We shouldn't require that nodes do this because this appears to be a > > possible security risk. > > I agree that it shouldn't be compulsory, but for > backward-compatability not for security reasons. Can you elaborate on > why you think this will be a security risk?
If it is required, it makes it impossible for people to make sure that their node only talks to certain nodes (which will require a few minor Freenet node changes be fully true (which will be put in nfreenetd)). -- Travis Bemann Sendmail is still screwed up on my box. My email address is really bemann at execpc.com. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 967 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000816/d26359fd/attachment.pgp>
