> I am well aware that it is important not to over-sell ourselves for
> reasons of professional integrity (something all-to-easily forgotten
> in this day and age, particularly when you spend all of your time
> talking to the media as I now seem to), but we must be cautious not
> to under-sell our work either when there are so many people willing
> to describe essentially stupid ideas as the "next big thing" (do I
> hear "push" technology?).
>
I think forcing protocol backwards compatibility is a bad idea at least
for the next release or two. However, I readily agree that preserving the
data across upgrades should be a goal. We should force upgrade to 0.4
when its ready, but doing so shouldn't harm the data.
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000817/a2c62c57/attachment.pgp>
